Sunday, August 12, 2012

Tom Horne disregards the peoples constitutional rights


Arizona’s Attorney General Targets Medical Marijuana Dispensaries Protected By State Law

In 2010, Arizona’s voters enacted the Arizona Medical Marijuana Act, which permits patients to use and clinics to provide medical cannabis without having to fear state prosecution, provided they obtain a permit from the state. The state began the process of distributing permits to clinics via lottery this week.
Yet, despite the fact that Arizona law no longer authorizes lawful marijuana dispensaries to be targeted by state officials, Attorney General Tom Horne (R-AZ) doesn’t seem to have received the memo:
Gov. Jan Brewer has signed a waiver, which will allow Attorney General Tom Horne to try to close down the marijuana dispensaries that her state health department is in the process of licensing.
The move comes in the wake of Horne’s formal legal opinion that the state cannot legally permit anyone to sell marijuana, even only to those who have a doctor’s recommendation to use the drug. Horne said as long as the drug remains illegal under federal law, the state is powerless to authorize anything to the contrary.
But the governor said Thursday she does not intend to block Health Director Will Humble from continuing the process of issuing state permits. And Humble, who conducted a lottery Tuesday to see who gets to serve each of the 126 health districts in the state, said the first of those shops could be open by the end of the month.
So one state agency will continue to issue permits to dispensaries telling them they are legally authorized to distribute marijuana to patients, while another state agency has vowed to shut these dispensaries down. If nothing else, this arrangement is tremendously cruel to the people who work in these dispensaries. When a state agency issues someone a permit saying their actions will not be subject to state prosecution, the permit holder should be able to rely on that promise.
Moreover, Horne’s claim that he is required to go after state dispensaries because marijuana is illegal under federal law is questionable at best. While it is true that state laws are “preempted” by federal laws that conflict with them, a fact that Horne relies upon in his anti-dispensary memo, nothing in Arizona’s medical marijuana law presents a genuine conflict with federal law. Rather, the Arizona law ensures that dispensaries who have valid state permits will not be targeted by state officials for providing medical marijuana. If the federal government wants to bring prosecutions, that’s up to them.
Even if federal law did force Arizona to bring prosecutions against people the state does not want to prosecute — and it does not — such a law would be unconstitutional. Horne may not be aware of this fact, but the Supreme Court decided an obscure case called NFIB v. Sebelius last June which reaffirmed that “the Constitution has never been understood to confer upon Congress the ability to require the States to govern according to Congress’ instructions.” The feds do have the constitutional authority to target marijuana dispensaries, but they must use their own officials and their own resources to do so.
Of course, Horne has not hesitated to make outlandish states rights arguments in defense of Arizona’s harsh anti-immigration law or as part of an assault on the Affordable Care Act. But it’s clear now that he only believes in states rights when doing so is convenient for him. The minute Arizona’s voters passed a medical marijuana law, he suddenly believes that Arizona is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the federal government.

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2012/08/10/671121/arizonas-attorney-general-targets-medical-marijuana-dispensaries-protected-by-state-law/?mobile=nc


My Opinion:

Both AZ Governor Jan Brewer and AZ Attorney General Tom Horne should not Resign they should be re-called from the office for which they hold for Violating their Oath of Office, which they swore to uphold to defend the Constitution.
(initiative, referendum and recall)

The Federal laws only pertain to commerce, therefore if you are a Non-profit organization they don't apply to you.

    

Tuesday, August 7, 2012

NEW WORLD ORDER


NEW WORLD ORDER

Global Elites --- & gt; New World Order ---> Illuminati, (Triladeral Trade Commission, Builderburg Group), etc. others: CIA, FBI, ATF, TSA, U.S. Marshals, Dept. of Justice, Dept. of Homeland Security, Obama (puppet), etc.

Evil Globalists who believe what they are doing is right, the sole purpose of their agenda is to make us all their slaves  through mind control, and gain absolute power for themselves with no opposition to stand in their way.

       
Presidents eligibility: new Hawaii evidence
http://giveusliberty1776.blogspot.com/2012/09/hawaii-recap.html


Internet Censorship by U.S. Gov.

Internet Censorship:

The Government attempted to shut down the Internet, with the help of Google.com and other groups trough petitions and urging our Senators to do the right thing, it was stopped.

Now even China is trying to use Internet Censorship on us as well. But Congress has put a stop to their spying.

Obama Has Control of the Internet.
He has a Internet Kill Switch for the Internet which he can use at any time.

 

Monday, August 6, 2012

Mass Mind Control


rense.com


Mass Mind Control 
Through Network Television 
Are Your Thoughts Your Own?

By Alex Ansary
Outside The Box
 12-29-5
Why do countless American people go along with the War on Iraq? Why do so many people call for a police state control grid? A major component to a full understanding of why this kind of governmental and corporate corruption is to discover the modern science of mind control and social engineering. It's baffling to merely glance at the stacks of documentation that this world government isn't being constructed for the greater good of humanity. Although there are a growing number of people waking up the reality of our growing transparent soft cage, there seems to be just enough citizens who are choosing to remain asleep. Worse yet, there are even those who were at least partially awake at one time but found it necessary to return to the slumber of dreamland.

This is no accident; this is a carefully crafted design. The drive to dumb down the populations of planet earth is a classic art that existed before the United States did. One component to understanding and deciphering the systems of control is to become a student of the magicians of influence and propaganda. In order to defeat our enemies (or dictators), its imperative that we understand how they think and what they believe in.

When people think about mind control, they usually think in terms of the classic "conspiracy theory" that refers to Project MkUltra. This program is a proven example of 'overt mind control.' The project had grown out of an earlier secret program, known as Bluebird that was officially formed to counter Soviet advances in brainwashing. In reality the CIA had other objectives. An earlier aim was to study methods 'through which control of an individual may be attained'. The emphasis of experimentation was 'narco-hypnosis', the blending of mind altering drugs with carefully hypnotic programming.

A crack CIA team was formed that could travel, at a moments notice, to anywhere in the world. Their task was to test the new interrogation techniques, and ensure that victims would not remember being interrogated and programmed. All manner of narcotics, from marijuana to LSD, heroin and sodium pentathol (the so called 'truth drug') were regularly used.

Despite poor initial results, CIA-sponsored mind control program flourished. On 13 April 1953, the super-secret project MK-ULTRA was born. Its scope was broader than ever before, and only those in the top echelon of the CIA were privy to it. Official CIA documents describe MK-ULTRA as an 'umbrella project' with 149 'sub-projects'. Many of these sub-projects dealt with testing illegal drugs for potential field use. Others dealt with electronics. One explored the possibility of activating 'the human organism by remote control'. Throughout, it remained a major goal to brainwash individuals to become couriers and spies without their knowledge.

When it was formed in 1947, the CIA was forbidden to have any domestic police or internal security powers. In short, it was authorized only to operate 'overseas'. From the very start MK-ULTRA staff broke this Congressional stipulation and began testing on unwitting American citizens.

Precisely how extensive illegal testing became will never be known. Richard Helms, CIA Director and chief architect of the program, ordered the destruction of all MK-ULTRA records shortly before leaving office in 1973. Despite these precautions some documents were misfiled and came to light in the late 1970's. They laid bare the spy agency's cynicism. Despite the widespread knowledge of MK Ultra and the civil lawsuits that followed, this form of behavior modification is not the most expansive. The real dangers are the types of thought control that are 'covert' and not the subject of several dozen Hollywood movies like "Clockwork Orange" and Mel Gibson's "Conspiracy Theory."

Our founding fathers faced enormous challenges in the formation of this country and its bill of rights. One challenge was laying down the groundwork or a free society without knowing what kind of technological advances would be made. Who would have guessed in those times that we needed an article in the bill of rights that specifically prohibits the government and it's associates from engaged in mind control or thought control. The closest item that promises our protection from the government is the 4th Article in The Bill of Rights which states, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." Like many are now beginning to note, the US Constitution and its Bill of Rights are merely given lip service by our supposedly elected officials.

One of the most common examples of mind control in our so-called free and civilized society is the advent and usage of the television set. This isn't to say that all things on TV are geared towards brainwashing you. They're not. But most of the programming on television today is run and programming by the largest media corporations that have interests in defense contracts, such as Westinghouse (CBS), and General Electric (NBC). This makes perfect sense when you see how slanted and warped the news is today. Examining the conflicts of interest is merely glancing at the issue, although to understand the multiple ways that lies become truth, we need to examine the techniques of brain washing that the networks are employing.

Radio isn't any different in its ability to brainwash a population into submission. Sixty-seven years ago, six million Americans became unwitting subjects in an experiment in psychological warfare. It was the night before Halloween, 1938. At 8 p.m. CST, the Mercury Radio on the Air began broadcasting Orson Welles' radio adaptation of H. G. Wells' War of the Worlds. As is now well known, the story was presented as if it were breaking news, with bulletins so realistic that an estimated one million people believed the world was actually under attack by Martians. Of that number, thousands succumbed to outright panic, not waiting to hear Welles' explanation at the end of the program that it had all been a Halloween prank, but fleeing into the night to escape the alien invaders.

According to researcher Mack White ( http://www.mackwhite.com/), "Psychologist Hadley Cantril conducted a study of the effects of the broadcast and published his findings in a book, The Invasion from Mars: A Study in the Psychology of Panic. This study explored the power of broadcast media, particularly as it relates to the suggestibility of human beings under the influence of fear. Cantril was affiliated with Princeton University's Radio Research Project, which was funded in 1937 by the Rockefeller Foundation. Also affiliated with the Project was Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) member and Columbia Broadcasting System (CBS) executive Frank Stanton, whose network had broadcast the program. Stanton would later go on to head the news division of CBS, and in time would become president of the network, as well as chairman of the board of the RAND Corporation, the influential think tank which has done groundbreaking research on, among other things, mass brainwashing. Two years later, with Rockefeller Foundation money, Cantril established the Office of Public Opinion Research (OPOR), also at Princeton. Among the studies conducted by the OPOR was an analysis of the effectiveness of "psycho-political operations" (propaganda, in plain English) of the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), the forerunner of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). Then, during World War II, Cantril and Rockefeller money assisted CFR member and CBS reporter Edward R. Murrow in setting up the Princeton Listening Center, the purpose of which was to study Nazi radio propaganda with the object of applying Nazi techniques to OSS propaganda. Out of this project came a new government agency, the Foreign Broadcast Intelligence Service (FBIS). The FBIS eventually became the United States Information Agency (USIA), which is the propaganda arm of the National Security Council. Thus, by the end of the 1940s, the basic research had been done and the propaganda apparatus of the national security state had been set up--just in time for the Dawn of Television."

Experiments conducted by researcher Herbert Krugman reveal that when a person watches television, brain activity switches from the left to the right hemisphere. The left hemisphere is the seat of logical thought. Here, information is broken down into its component parts and critically analyzed. The right brain, however, treats incoming data uncritically, processing information in wholes, leading to emotional, rather than logical responses. The shift from left to right brain activity also causes the release of endorphins, the body's own natural opiates--thus, it is possible to become physically addicted to watching television, a hypothesis borne out by numerous studies which have shown that very few people are able to kick the television habit. It's no longer an overstatement to note that the youth today that are raised and taught through network television are intellectually dead by their early teens.

The dumbing down of humanity is represented by another shift which occurs in the brain when we watch television. Activity in the higher brain regions (such as the neo-cortex) is diminished, while activity in the lower brain regions (such as the limbic system) increases. The latter, commonly referred to as the reptile brain, is associated with more primitive mental functions, such as the "fight or flight" response. The reptile brain is unable to distinguish between reality and the simulated reality of television. To the reptile brain, if it looks real, it is real. Thus, though we know on a conscious level it is "only a film," on a conscious level we do not--the heart beats faster, for instance, while we watch a suspenseful scene. Similarly, we know the commercial is trying to manipulate us, but on an unconscious level the commercial nonetheless succeeds in, say, making us feel inadequate until we buy whatever thing is being advertised--and the effect is all the more powerful because it is unconscious, operating on the deepest level of human response. The reptile brain makes it possible for us to survive as biological beings, but it also leaves us vulnerable to the manipulations of television programmers. This is where the manipulators use our own emotions as strings to control us. The distortions and directions we are being moved to are taking place in the subconscious, often undetected.

Propaganda techniques were first codified and applied in a scientific manner by journalist Walter Lippman and psychologist Edward Bernays (nephew of Sigmund Freud) early in the 20th century. During World War I, Lippman and Bernays were hired by then United States President, Woodrow Wilson, to participate in the Creel Commission, the mission of which was to sway popular opinion in favor of entering the war, on the side of Britain. Edward Bernays said in his 1928 book Propaganda that, "The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country."

The Creel Commission provided themes for speeches by "four-minute men" at public functions, and also encouraged censorship of the American press. The Commission was so unpopular that after the war, Congress closed it down without providing funding to organize and archive its papers. The war propaganda campaign of Lippman and Bernays produced within six months such an intense anti-German hysteria as to permanently impress American business (and Adolf Hitler, among others) with the potential of large-scale propaganda to control public opinion. Bernays coined the terms "group mind" and "engineering consent", important concepts in practical propaganda work. The current public relations industry is a direct outgrowth of Lippman's and Bernays' work and is still used extensively by the United States government. For the first half of the 20th century Betrays and Lip man ran a very successful public relations firm. World War II saw continued use of propaganda as a weapon of war, both by Hitler's propagandist Joseph Gobbles and the British Political Warfare Executive, as well as the United States Office of War Information.

Turn on your local newscast. You have a few minutes of blue-collar crime, hardly any white collar crime, a few minutes of sports, misc. chit chat, random political jibber-jabber, and a look at the weather that no one is forecasting correctly. Is that what happened in your town? And we're supposed to own the airwaves! The mainstream media openly supports the interests of the prison industrial complex. The stories focus on minority criminal groups, and exploit the real threat to appear much more dangerous than they are. Think about the growing per capita number of prisoners in the country. Then remember that this is happening at the same time that our prison boom began. The police on our streets have created criminals. The focus is to keep us in a state of fear, that way the elitists can attack any group they want to without fear of consequence. This is why the media is continuing to craft the timeless art of dehumanization.

The techniques are increasing in their sophistication over time as the mind scientists that serve the empire continue to discover scientific breakthroughs as to how the human brain functions, learns, retains information, and behaves. The most effective brainwashing techniques are used on the most successful propaganda networks. Examine the music bed that lies low during the fright night scope of the second. It's spooky. I wonder if we are supposed to be thinking with our minds or getting ready for stunt. Observe the graphics with the music. They're glitzy and flashing. Like the monkey that is attracted to shiny objects, it's our monkey hand that controls to remote often stops the search for entertainment when the proper amount of glamour catches their attention. Most importantly, notice the repetition behind the lies that the politicians and their corporate media groupies tell us. You see, the unimaginable fallacies are created as 'truth' not because it's logical or provable, but because of the broken record technique. No matter how ridiculous the lie, it's repeated often enough that the brain doesn't know the difference between reality and nursery rhymes. This technique is under estimated in its ability to allow the puppeteers to hypnotize millions of people. Instead of "Fair and balanced" it's "We say it enough times, and you believe it."

It's a tragic day when the state can monopolize on the enslaving and imprisonment of a population. Hollywood will continue to frighten us with films on the mafia, gangsters, and the corrupt blue collar criminal whose stupidity and greed get them caught. In the end, our minds are already pre conditioned to accept living in a police state economy and society because we read it in the paper, saw it praised on the news and talk shows, or saw it in a movie. There are several movies planned right now that support the official story of 911 and a few movies that glamorize the War on IRAQ. According to David L Robb, Author of Operation Hollywood, "Hollywood and the Pentagon have a long history of making movies together. It's a tradition that stretches back to the early days of silent films, and extends right up until the present day. It's been a collaboration that works well for both sides. Hollywood producers get what they want - access to billions of dollars worth of military hardware and equipment - tanks, jet fighters, nuclear submarines and aircraft carriers - and the military gets what it wants - films that portray the military in a positive light; films that help the services in their recruiting efforts. The Pentagon is not merely a passive supporter of films, however. If the Pentagon doesn't like a script, it will usually suggest script changes that will allow the film to receive the military's support and approval. Sometimes these proposed changes are minor. But sometimes the changes are dramatic. Sometimes they change dialogue. Sometimes they change characters. Sometimes they even change history." They create something coined 'disinfotainment'. They mix disinformation with entertainment and call it disinfotainment.

Unadulterated Violence is now accepted on regular TV. Killing in the name of the mother government is praised, that is unless the violence is committed in self defense to protect someone from the system. Sharp shooters, bombers, and assassin are worshipped if they are fighting for the system, are in the military, or are associated with groups that control the masses locally, such as the local police department. I don't condone violence, however it's hypocritical to support one form of homicide when it favors the elite, and condemn another when it's done to protect your land, freedom, or loved ones. This odd reality transfers itself into the shady world of video games that are stepped in plots and tasks to kill as much as the player can. The players are getting younger and younger with 7 out of 10 children playing games with a 'Mature' rating. Recently I was browsing the PC video game selection at a very large electronics store. I was appalled to see nearly 50 different games in which the setting of the game is IRAQ and the goal is to kill as many insurgents as possible and fulfill the mission. Children today are being indoctrinated through their favorite games and law enforcement programs to be the button pushes of the weapons of mass destruction for tomorrow's world.

Is it any wonder why there are two house bills and a senate bill (with more on the way), which are giant steps in dismantling free speech of the general public. These bills together would kill (PEG) cable access centers where the public still owns the airwaves. It's the programming created locally, without censorship or commercial gain. Their income is derived from franchises within the local cities and a small percentage cable subscriber frees. This is a corporate takeover because this is centralizing communication by removing the locally based programming and moving the audience to the more official, nationalistic, and sensational programs that promotes violence, uniformity, and slavery over peach, diversity and freedom. Cable access features free speech and information with perspectives neglected by mainstream television. It also features a free flow programming system with fresh programs being aired by new producers on a rotating basis. This keeps the content and information creative and locally based while network TV is rigid with regular time slots and repetitive programming.

The blocks of programming that are universally accepted parallel the shift to craft our entire lives towards the factory's bell and the illusion of time. This is the creation of the hive mind. The hive mind is result of massive brainwashing to the general public. Everyone shares the same thoughts, goals, knowledge and understanding. A hive mind society gears itself towards conformity and ignores diversity while masqueraded as the road to utopia in mainstream television. Network programming, weather it's the news or drama, is geared towards artificially creating your world and reality. With the proper amount of entertainment and sensationalism, we may even be living our lives through the television set. Many anchors and actors are beautiful and research shows that attractive people are usually perceived as trust worthy. While the real news rolls quickly by on the bottom of your screen, the anchor is selling you on the idea of having your very own police state hell hole right here in your local jurisdiction, or how 2 sports opposing teams chased around on a court for 2 hours in attempt to score points means something to you. No education, no information, SPIN. Today the media represents a tool of brainwashing and indoctrination that is utilized on behalf of the owners interests.

Since the 1996 Telco act, television and radio stations all across the nation were bought out by major international media outlets. Clear Channel and Infinity are the two largest corporations in radio today. This has centralized the distribution of information and has threatened our free society ever since. The media drums to the heartbeat of its owners, whose interests are not of the general public. Instead they are interested in their other financial endeavors like defense contracting, oil business, political parties, prison industry. The conflicts of interest are monumental with the deregulation of the corporations. The lines are now blurred between one network's coverage of the war and the other.

Once we come to the conclusion that the media is intentionally deceiving us, we can apply the principles of problem-reaction-solution. This formula takes a problem by either creating it or allowing it to happen and presenting that to the population. It could be terrorism, molestation, extra terrestrials. These topics create fear and no one in their right mind would support terrorism or crime. It's therefore OK to blast the television, the papers, and radio with 'the problem.' The natural reaction from the people is a request for more control to ensure more safety. Most let their fear and emotional side control their decisions and usually translated into something like, "The government needs more power over our lives to make us safer and freer from tyranny. I believe what the media tells me so I will support whatever decisions they make." Today's mainstream corporate news program discourages dissent of the war and paints activists with a negative brush that hints of treason. At the same time, the so-called journalists are cogs in a much larger machine who know that if they report a story that paints the government in a dark light, is likely to remain on 'the wire' and off the front page.

The most disturbing thing about spending a single hour examining network cable news and modern Hollywood films are the reoccurring themes in the backdrop. The central ideas of countless "investigative reports" or "Friday night special" features are about a threat of some type over the horizon. The end of the world as we know it is being sold. If the news isn't feeding it to you, then the History Channel or Discover Channel are either talking about the crusades, asteroids, UFOs, earthquakes, terrorism, or exposes about serial killers. They are crafted a message that our world is unstable, and the threat is always an invisible and dangerous one that only our military can fix. When you record and log all the messages, you end up with a script, a screen write produced through the movie studios of Hollywood hell.
I am not alone in noting this observation. Local and network news are designing their editorials about despair and fear because the owners, producers, and editors now understand that fear sells. The end result are the desired ratings, delivered like expected. The masters of modern spin understand that we like to be terrified. Just look at the success in the action/suspense/terror genres that have plopped onto the conveyor belt and packaged for our glee consumption. When the editors in charge found out that simply plastering a terror alert chart didn't scare the people the same way it used to, they began to kick up the campaign of terror a few notches with new and creative ways to sell the police state.

When you get to the other side of the terror alerts of all shapes and sizes, you find another nightmare masquerading as the savior. The 'Ministry of Truth' will protect you. The mother government is here to rescue you and squash this brown terrorist bug, this gray alien, this avian bird flu, and every other nightmare that the nightly news brought you. The finest public relations specialists take the science of worshipping our kings down to a frame by frame level. George W. Bush is pictured in numerous poises with a hallo around his head. In other pictures, he stands tall with dozens of American flags blowing in the wind behind him. A more blasphemous display features him speaking in front of the cross of Jesus Christ. The message send couldn't be more clearly presented. Our current leaders are of the messiah status and only through them, will we reach the gates of safety. The lie that has been accepted by so many as truth is that this is a religious war. Numerous prime time programs are telling the story of the crusades (without the horrors) to synch our vibrations up to something out of the 13th Century, instead of the 21st Century. If the America people accept the fact that the crusades are here, that George Bush reports directly to god, and that revelations are here, then they have won the war for our minds.

The loudspeaker whispers, "All our problems are by accident, never design." Across the room the system's minion snorts, "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." It's that plot that says Middle Eastern terrorists from an Afghan cave are the reason beyond our little, "War on terror." Related messages in the script demonize young minority males and suggest harsh punishments for crimes they commit. They don't come out overtly and state their racist agenda. They come at you from the side by airing the same crime news repetitively, usually when it's committed by the minority group. The networks love the fact that the TV sets the norms in society and today, and hence politically opinion. Who would imagine that in the United States of America, both candidates of both parties in the 2004 election would be members of the Skull and Bones society at Yale University? Out of 290 million Americans, this is the best we could come up with?

It is the decision of the owners to influence producers, editors, and others involved to paint to brush to fit the objective, which is the bottom line. If Sports is what the people want, then they get it, usually in large doses. Multi-media sports (or spectator sports) is just an escape from our own existence. It's like gambling, or drug addiction. It provides that buffer zone of rooting for something with other people that we've been told is good. People's fantasies also lead them to fixating on sports. Its simulated masculinity, in an age where there's a push to change us from men to robots. It's human nature to resist and fight that which is suppressing us. The sociologists and psychologists in areas of influence know this. Spectator sports prove the outlet internationally for what has been stripped away from us. We've lost the right to rebel and change our government through warfare if necessary. Today the bulk of our nation's population today doesn't know what's really going on with the fall of the American dollar and the plans for the transfer of American wealth to other countries. However, most can tell you who the top basketball or football players are. A lot of fans wish they were the stars, out there on the stage, the court, and the drag strip. Either you're "numero uno" in center stage or you're nothing. End of story.

What I never understood when I was in high school was why my peers and friends would act naïve or ignorant in a "Wayne's World" or "Beavis and Butthead" kind of way. What I've learned since then is that the numerous programs that are pimping themselves of as 'entertainment' are actually demo graphed to the lowest common denominator. This is especially true with disc jockeys in Radio today. The reason our airwaves are saturated with jokes and content centered on fart jokes, private parts, borderline racism, and general trash talk is because it is selling. In the meantime, large numbers of our children, young adults, and older audiences are mimicking what they see and hear because the current 'norm' is selling this behavior as cool or 'chic.' When the conditioned is so intense that these forms of content are considered the norm, anything else seems either bizarre or uninteresting to the average American's attention span that is decreasing by the day. Hypothetically, if a producer on a network did get away from a feature story exposing government corruption at the highest levels, chances are the large impact necessary wouldn't be realized because the average viewer's brain has already been conditioned to seek out certain types of disinfotainment.

The media has created the picture perfect society that could exist if we only did things their way, (their interests/government interest). It tells us what happiness is and what it is not and same for love, hate or anything else they can implant into our sub consciousness. We can become the perfect slave to the system through indoctrination given through network TV. Over time the messages are becoming increasingly racist, violent, and dishonest. But the programming began decades ago and few have the eyes to see it for what it has become. We live in a world where the populations give their minds away to the official version of the event, where utopia is right around the corner when big brother is riding shotgun. It's a world where Hollywood can make you believe anything, even that you are free. It's a world in which the prosecutor and the judge sit on the same side of the bench. The most obvious reason that our minds are being controlled on a massive scale psychologically, is become our culture has been conditioned incriminatingly to a TV, a radio, or a paper. We are given the world reality through a screen, some ink, or radio waves. The truth is hiding in plain site. The indoctrination through these mediums warns us that views other than those presented by them are unimportant and too be condemned. This Administration and media monopoly has a carefully crafted dehumanization program to anyone that dissents the official version of events.

Some people are wrong about 5% of the time. Some are wrong most of the time. I wish I was wrong all the time. A lot of people deal with these
intense realities, by asking me rhetorically, "What is the solution, smart guy?" Remember, it's the viewers, the consumers and all the other little votes called dollars that helped this oligarchy system lay its concrete foundation in our backyards. We must recognize the truth about why the system is flawed and enslaving us if we wish to beat it. The most important solution to fighting this type of brainwashing and mind control is to start with ourselves and our own awakening in the smaller things. In this case, it's brainwashing but after awhile we break Outside the Box and begin venturing outside the system and into unknown terrain. Fighting with people and forcing them to understand 'our truth' is not a solution. If our collective free will created this nightmare, than only our collective free will change it. The battle begins in the heart and mind of the beholder, and then extends outward from there, only to those open to the information.

If you choose to travel the road to the truth, then you must be prepared for the obstacles that await you. You may be condemned or criticized by your family, your friends, your lovers, or your co-workers. This is their programming that began at birth that is doing exactly what it's supposed to do. You're going to have to be stronger than that. You must realize that there is a reality that exists outside of this controlled artificial system. Like Indiana Jones in the Last Crusade, he took that 'leap of faith' over the bridgeless canyon in an attempt to get to the other side. Like Neo in the Matrix, he took the red pill from Morpheus in his attempt to cross over to his real self. Once you wake up, it's as if a hypnotist came along and snapped his fingers. You wake up and say to yourself, "Oh my god. I can see it now. Why did it take me so long to wake up?!" For some of you it can be a major shock. Like anything else, take this information and knowledge in stages. If it took a lifetime for them to mold your reality for you, then you know that it may take longer than a day to fully awaken. Remember, the journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.



“brainwashing” .... i.e. bombarding of the brain with low-frequency radio waves



Friday, July 30, 2010

Constitutional Duties of a Sheriff

Constitutional Duties of a Sheriff

by Richard Mack (Utah)

Speech given at the Restaurant Social and Speakers Forum of the IAP National Conference, January 17, 2003, Taylorsville (Salt Lake City), Utah. Richard Mack is a former county sheriff in Arizona, successful challenger of the Brady Bill, and a member of the Independent American Party.

[Introduction by Will Christensen, IAP Western States Coordinator:]

Well its my pleasure to introduce Richard Mack. Richard was the sheriff of a small county in Arizona when the Brady bill was passed, and he decided that that was not what he wanted to enforce, and so he filed suit against the federal government -- he and a sheriff up in Montana, if I remember correctly. And he took that suit all the way to the Supreme Court and won a tremendous freedom victory. And I understand he's going to talk about the ramifications of that, so without further ado, my friend Richard Mack.

[Address by Richard Mack:]

Well, I think the most important aspect of that introduction is that I'm Will's friend. Thank you. Since I did that, I lost a few friends.

If I could have your indulgence for a minute, I am presently employed, technically not in the field of my choice. The one that I actually chose to be part of was stripped from me when I did the lawsuit on the Brady bill. But my second choice would be to be in the freedom movement full time, which is what I am right now. I work as public affairs director for Gun Owners of America. Let me tell you just a little bit about them. If you're not a member you should be. There's a few organizations in this country where you can put stock into their fundamental beliefs and agenda -- Gun Owners of America is one of them. I worked with them before I worked for them. Now I work with them and for them.

Larry Pratt is the executive director. You'll never meet a finer Christian and you'll never meet somebody in this country who has sacrificed more for the God-given freedoms we've been talking about tonight. Gun Owners of America is not a single-issue organization. They are the second largest gun rights organization in this country. But the biggest one in the country who believes in the fundamental values of the Constitution -- the principles espoused in the Constitution by the founders. They believe -- they are not afraid to say -- they're pro-life and anti-UN completely and totally. Of course, if you're going to be pro-gun you can't be pro-UN. And if you're going to be pro-life, you can't be pro-UN. And a lot of these hidden agendas that are part of the United Nations are freely talked about in our newsletter. And so I have here in front of me -- and its 20 dollars to become a member. And if any of you have already purchased my books, then for you its only 10. So you'd get both of my books and a membership in Gun Owners of America for just thirty dollars. That would make these worth five dollars each.

Let me, I would like to pass these around if I could, if you want one and could be a member, please do so. This is a very Constitutional organization and you'll get the newsletter and within the next year it'll prove itself to you. So if you could just make sure every couple gets -- I'd like everybody to join or at least every couple to join in that fight.

Cash, check credit cards, but I prefer gold or silver -- so a tenth ounce of gold would do it, or like three or four silver coins, probably four silver coins. You know, Will mentioned something. Will has been incorrect before in his life, and we could check with his wife on that, but he mentioned a sheriff that joined me in my lawsuit. Let me give you just a little real quick history on that.

When the Brady bill first was announced publicly, it was billed and advertised, propagandized from the Clinton white house as a mere waiting period to make our streets safer from people who would jump out of their house in anger to run to a gun shop, grab a gun and come back and kill their kids and wife. Which I tried to find out in all the police departments across the country if that had ever happened, and I couldn't find one incident of that ever occurring. And even if it did, this still wouldn't have prevented any such thing.

Anyway, President Clinton was propagandizing the Brady bill as a measure to make our streets safer for police; and a time, when of course its for our children, that they could play in the parks in public in safety because we'll have this Brady bill. Well that was another Clintonesque piece of propaganda and probably matched the truthfulness of his "I did not have sex with that woman ...."

Now, the Brady bill, when I got closer to it, I started getting a little bit worried about it. But I wasn't going to have a major heart attack and I never intended to file a lawsuit. I was sheriff the whole time that this was being talked about. I paid very little attention to it. I did not start forming a political action committee saying what are we going to do about this Brady bill thing. It happened when the BATF sent three of their agents to a sheriff's association meeting in Phoenix, Arizona. Any of you from Arizona know that there's only 15 counties in Arizona -- about half of what there are in Utah. And so to get 13 or 14 sheriffs together is not that hard. And we actually had 12 of us. We had a quorum. And the BATF shows up to address 12 sheriffs -- it takes three of them. And there -- you know what they were there for -- to hand us our marching orders as to how we we're going to comply with the Brady bill.

Now I was having a heart attack. And the rest of the sheriffs did also. The one from Showlow [Arizona], Gary Butler -- all of them did. You never heard so much cussing in your life. I guarantee you. And those sheriffs can cuss good even when they're not mad. And now they were mad. And we tabled the discussion until the next week we had a special meeting. And then we came back and said okay, what are we going to do about the Brady bill? And I said, if we all stand together against this, we can just say "no" to it. And they wouldn't do it. They went down. I said let's send a letter to Janet Reno, President, c-c it to the senators and put a notice in the paper that we're not doing it. And let the people know why. These guys were really afraid that the constituents would say that we're taking the law into our own hands, and we should set a better example than that. And so I said, there is no way I'm going to go along with this, and if we allow this then where's it going to stop. There's not a one of us that reports to the BATF, and they're trying to make it that way.

And so I came home from that meeting and talked to my boss and asked her what we should do, and told her I was probably going to file a lawsuit -- and see, and that is what's so stupid about all this, and maybe I showed my own naivete. I didn't form that committee and I didn't go around door to door and calling people and ask them if this was the right thing to do. There was only three people that made this decision -- and it was me, my wife and the good Lord. And because it was an automatic decision for me -- I certainly prayed about this absolutely. But I believe that the decision was made that quick. When the BATF showed up and said this, I said you know its over. You don't need to ask the Lord, if you know to say. do I need to do this good thing? You know, but certainly I asked for his help and his strength in performing the duties that are associated with this arduous task of suing the Clinton administration. A small town sheriff -- Grand County was thirty thousand people -- its a farming community -- copper mining area. And then when I filed the lawsuit I was alone. No one else in the country had talked about doing this -- NO ONE. And then luckily -- boy did I have a great day when I found out that Sheriff Prince from Montana was also doing the same thing.

He never called me -- I never called him. I never met him before in my life until we were asked to be on the Phil Donahue Show together. Of course the other side was there, Sarah Brady was there and an attorney from Handgun Control Incorporated. Here's two country sheriff's debating Sarah Brady and an attorney from Handgun Control Incorporated. And Phil Donahue said something that was very different for him. He said he really respected our constitutional concerns -- and that was on nationwide television -- he said that. So miracles were taking place with this whole thing. Ultimately, seven sheriffs joined the lawsuit -- filed lawsuits in separate jurisdictions across the country -- not more than one from any one state -- Vermont, Mississippi, Louisiana, Texas, Wyoming, Montana and Arizona. That's it. There's 3000 sheriffs in the country.

Seven filed the suit. And it wasn't without some real repercussions. Several -- uh two or three --of the sheriffs lost their re-election bids right away. And I lost mine about nine months before the decision came out that we won. And it really would have helped had we got that just a little bit earlier, but it was a four-year battle. Not quite a four-year battle. But to get to the District Court, Circuit Court, and then to the U.S. Supreme Court and get a victory in four years -- any of you lawyers know how miraculous that was -- it was really a miracle. And I'm telling you right now, that victory made everything -- losing the job, moving, losing the home and everything else, we completely started over -- COMPLETELY started over -- at how old were we, I was about 42, I guess.

And then to come up to Utah County -- and say, you know, because I was a cop in Utah County. I started my police career in Provo [Utah] and I was a cop for 11 years. And then some crazy people from Arizona had called me and said we want you to move home to Arizona and run for sheriff. And I told them they were crazy -- and this is one time my wife agreed with me that her parents were crazy. And she really did, you know. And then three months later we did the crazy thing, picked up and left, and went home to Arizona. And I took a leave of absence from Provo, because in case I didn't win, I could come back. And I had to commute to Provo for court cases and other things that I had to be there for -- like six times during the campaign. Sometimes I was literally campaigning on the phone from Provo. And its totally a miracle. So, and then after the miracle, we started to say winning this election, not having even lived in my own community for 13 years, and never being a cop in Arizona or my community ever before, and then winning sheriff. And we all talked about what a miracle that was. And my wife and mother -- both being sensitive to that when I filed the lawsuit on the Brady bill, both of them within a day -- mentioned to me, now we know why you were elected sheriff.

And it really did seem to be an errand for the Almighty. And it went a real roller coaster ride. That's really how I described the lawsuit. One day it would be that you know we were getting inducted into the NRA hall of fame; and the next day we were being demonized by the national media as right-wing extremist radical terrorists. And most of you've been called the same thing because you believe in the Constitution. And isn't it amazing that those who quote the Constitution and the founding fathers today are demonized as radical extremists and even terrorists. How sad that our Constitution has taken on that kind of public scrutiny. Amazing that our media would allow that to happen and that politicians who go along with this redistribution of the wealth and forced charity as we were talking about earlier -- see forced charity by government is tyranny. And if charity has to be forced, its not charity folks. Its not charity. Call it anything but charity. Its NOT charity.

And I thought all of that, and I started studying the Constitution way back -- and the importance of this book, its a short booklet, its thirty pages long, but its probably the most powerful thirty pages you'll read anywhere. It talks about my personal conversion to the Constitution. And did I say conversion? I said conversion, didn't I? It was a religious and spiritual experience for me. And it happened during the process, the biggest part of it was when I took a class -- taught by my mentor and friend and one of the most stalwart Constitutionalists on the face of this planet, when I attended his class called Constitutional Studies for Law Enforcement. You probably know who it is now -- Cleon Skousen -- W. Cleon Skousen. He was really famous for that, wasn't he? It didn't matter who he was talking to -- it was Constitutional Studies for Teachers or Constitutional Studies for Janitors, or Constitutional Studies for Cops, or Constitutional Studies for Cops Wives. It was all the same, he just named it to whoever he was teaching, but it was all the same class and it was always about the Constitution. And it talks about that in here, and how some things happened in my life that got me from being a numbers cop of just writing the tickets -- which I believe now is one of the greatest abuses of government that we have anywhere in our country. The revenue collection that happens because these guys wear a badge, called radar tickets, is an absolute outrage and abuse. It is a lark. We've got to change it.

And I really hope most of you know where I got the title for this book. Somebody mentioned a little while ago The Proper Role of Government. Well, I learned that from Cleon, just change it and make it a little bit more job specific. And so is this meant for cops to read this? Absolutely! And should every one of you read it first? Absolutely! And the jest of this is every police officer in this country took an oath and has taken an oath as well as most schoolteachers and every public official to uphold and defend the U. S. Constitution.

And what happens when we, as I was, as Sheriff placed in the quandary of choosing between statutory obedience or Constitutional adherence? See, that's the quandary I was in. There's a statue from on high from Washington, D.C. that said the Brady bill must be enforced by you sheriffs. And now I'm in the predicament of saying, but I read the Constitution. And I know that I was constitutionally elected by, for and of the people of Grand County, to protect and according to my oath, their constitutional rights. And in a democracy, I could probably have a lot of leeway, huh? You know, because as soon as one person or more than fifty percent of the people in my community said go ahead and enforce the Brady bill, you got our permission, then I could do that in a democracy. But in a Constitutional Republic, where I gave my word to protect the Constitution, if a hundred percent of the people in my community said for me to enforce it, I could not. Because I would be violating my word.

And you see, the founding fathers were naive in that sense -- is that when they put the requirement that every public official state and local would swear allegiance to the Constitution, they intended and trusted us that we would keep our word. And that might have been part of their problem. They should have put something in there that would punish us if we did not. And maybe they did, but it wasn't specific enough for today's political correctness problem. And I think you know if you don't go with the Constitution then you 're probably under the heading of the treason crime. But boy, I'll tell you if we have the FBI doing all of that, doing all the follow-up on all the traitors in Washington D.C.; boy would they be busy and finally have something to do that would be legitimate, huh?

And I would I like to make one other point out of this book. I make reference to a hero of mine. Her name was Rosa Parks. And do you know what? We need to pay attention to her story. Because what did she teach us? And what does the left side honor her for and -- in fact she got some congressional awards just a couple of years ago for what she did. And it was because she defied stupid law. And I believe that falls right in with our theory that defiance of tyranny is obedience to God.

See, she was arrested. It wasn't just a tradition that she give up her seat to a white man. It was the LAW! And what did the cop do when he got there? The same thing he tells us when he takes our gun or when he puts us in jail or he writes the ticket when we complain about his actions. What does he say? Just doing my job. You know I don't make the law lady, I'm the enforcer. And every cop will tell you that there's been plenty of times during his career that he hasn't enforced every law. We're not required to, we shouldn't and we shouldn't be obeying about 98 % of the laws or enforcing about 98 % that are there now, as a matter of routine.

If you've ever been to any of these courts that they call justice courts in Utah and across America? -- they are anything but. The judge is a rubber stamp for a police officer, and the police officer is a rubber stamp for the legislature, and here we have the executive and judicial and legislative branches all meshed into one. In fact, what are the police officers -- say, basically they are puppets for the judges and the legislative branches and that they are just following orders.

Well that's what the cop said when he went to arrest Rosa Parks. And he did arrest her and she was booked into jail. And she -- what would a cop that was really a statesman, that was really sincere about his oath of office, what would a sheriff have his deputies be doing if he took his oath of office seriously, then or now? He would have his deputy get on that bus and sit down next to Rosa Parks and make sure she got off the bus safely and got home in the same manner. And so when they make laws that are now today a violation of the First Amendment.

Okay, let's talk about guns. Let's start in California and work our way east shall we? In California they're confiscating guns, they're arresting people who have guns in their cars. They're taking the guns -- and even if the guy is found not guilty, the guns are still confiscated and destroyed under the nuisance law. You never get it back whether you're found not guilty or not. The right to keep and bear arms right now is subject to what? -- Government approval. Period, end of sentence, nationally. There's one state that has no permits. You can carry concealed or open anywhere in the state. Its Vermont. Thank you. Guess who has the lowest crime rate? Which state has the lowest crime rate every year? Yeah they're not very populated, its the crime rate per population, per capita we're talking about there. And yet, most people in this country don't even know that exists do they? They don't but they have that going on there.

And boy that brings us into now of course this book, this one's kind of beat up; this is my own copy, where I give my speeches out of it. In my son's school at middle school in Provo last year, he was taught that the word in the Second Amendment in his government class -- "militia" referred to -- you know it, referred to the National Guard or the U.S. Army. Do you know how stupid that is? And this liberal teacher was trying to re-write history, literally re-writing history, and telling my son a lie. Teaching him not what the founding fathers intended. Do you know that he could look up in any contemporary dictionary today and find out militia and its right. Look up in the dictionary "militia." I've yet to see one that was really wrong. They all call them a citizen's volunteer group. That's exactly what it is. Its a volunteer group of citizens. So is there a contradiction in the Second Amendment? No, the militia -- the citizen volunteers -- who what were called out by --? Another thing that's left out in most of our history books today -- Paul Revere. Paul Revere's ride. Start looking at your grade school history books. He's not in there any more. Why? Because, does that fit into today's society, where you have somebody riding through the country telling everybody to get their assault rifles out of the closet to come stand against tyrannical government? Ooh, we don't want people thinking that's okay. So that's got to be conspicuously left out of history books.

And what did one of my favorite quotes in the book here is -- George Mason, founding father from Virginia, legislator from Virginia -- this is page 178. "I ask sir what is the militia?" They told us. All that teacher had to do was do a little research, and it probably take her five minutes to find out what the militia really was. "It is the whole people, except for a few public officials." To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.

You see, in America we were intended to be the boss. How could we ever be the boss if we didn't own weapons of war? And I just think this is common sense. Does this mean we're supposed to have tanks and bazookas at our homes and what not? No, I think it simply means the weapons of war that are reasonably kept and born. Okay? I can bear this one. And that's really all you need. In a guerrilla warfare we could always win, and it is a great defense to tyranny and to any nation who wants to invade America. Because we have every one of us ready for them. Sounds worth while, doesn't it?

All of the citizens defending our country and defending our freedom. Its our responsibility. Read the Declaration of Independence.

If I got anything out of what the other speakers have said tonight, I believe that its time for another Boston Tea Party. It is. The Boston Tea Party was not violent, it didn't hurt anybody and it sent a strong message. That's how I feel. I want this to remain peaceful. I love America. I don't fear my government, I hate it. But the government is out of control. I hate Osama Bin Laden and I hate Sadam Hussein. But let's not play games here. The greatest enemy to America is within. The greatest threat to your freedom and mine lies within the walls of America. And one of the greatest threats to the God-given Constitutional American Liberty is our own federal government. We continue to have people who march around and prance around as pretended statesmen when they have proven that staying in Washington D.C. too long will ruin a good person. So Orrin [Sen. Hatch, Utah] you should have left about 20 years ago.

Also over at my table is a copy of the Supreme Court decision written by Justice Scallia. We've heard his name before. And if you don't have this, they cost me a dollar fifty to make them, and so I want you to have it. If you can't afford the dollar fifty, take it anyway. You can make as many copies of this as you like. Okay? Its extremely powerful. You would think that the Constitution was completely restored when you read through this. It was odd it was based on the Tenth Amendment. And I believe that this is where your sheriff really comes in to count here.

James Madison said in the Federalist Papers: "We can safely rely on the disposition of the State Legislatures to erect barriers against the encroachments of the national authority." That's what your sheriff's supposed to do, that's what your governor's supposed to do, that's what you mayor, city council, county commissioners, dogcatcher, are all supposed to do. Teachers, school boards all of them. They are autonomous, you can see it right here, they are sovereign -- and yes, under article 1, Section 8, the federal government does have superior authority under those eighteen assignments, eighteen duties. Anything outside that they cannot do it. And so they are probably about 98 % in everything they do outside the Constitution.

On the bottom of page 19 it gave me the greatest reward we could have ever had. Justice Scallia, and I quote, said this: "But the Constitution protects us from our own best intentions."

I had a friend in the State Legislature who actually passed some of these around to other legislators here in Utah and they said, "how do we know that's true?" That was their response. That was their response!

I don't know how many of you were there when Alan Keyes came to speak in Orem [Utah], but he gave a tremendous speech about two years ago and he said this during that speech, and I added it to the book right then and there. I was re-writing this book at the time. He said: "The only difference between today's slavery and the slavery of the old South is that at least the plantation owners paid for the chains."

And now I would like to leave with you -- and I do this at almost 99 % of my speeches because this is when I became converted to the Constitution -- I would like to leave with you the political prayer taught to me by Cleon Skousen at that Constitution Studies for Law Enforcement. He teaches this to children -- which I have done since to all my children and other grade schools. But it was during this political prayer with sign language, his own made up that converted me that I felt the spirit of freedom and the spirit of Moroni and the spirit of America so strong in my heart that I have never forgot it since.

And it goes like this [accompanied with sign language]: "We, the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, ensure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare and secure the blessing of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."

And he described what those wings are: That's America -- Long may she be free.

Thank you so much. I love you.

http://www.usiap.org/Viewpoints/Zhold/Speeches/SpeechConstitutionalDutiesOfASheriff.html

Saturday, July 10, 2010

LINKS - READ, LISTEN, LEARN, AND PARTICUPATE

FREEDOM & LIBERTY - TEA PARTY:

Gun Owners of America
http://gunowners.org/
"The only no-compromise gun lobby in Washington"
- Ron Paul (R-TX)

Loyal to Liberty - Preserving the Constitution
http://loyaltoliberty.blogspot.com/2009/03/preserving-constitution.html

Tea Party Patriots
http://teapartypatriots.org/

Tea Party Express
http://teapartyexpress.com/

Freedom Works
www.freedomworksforamerica.org

Right Online
http://thenextright.com/category/blog-tags/tea-party

The Heritage Foundation, Leadership For America
http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2012/10/religious-liberty-and-expression-under-attack-restoring-americas-first-freedoms

RADIO:
Alex Jones
www.infowars.com


LAW:

United States Justice Foundation
http://usjf.net/

Judge Andrew Napolitano
www.freedomwatchonfox.com

MORTGAGES:

Mortgage Foreclosures
Neil Garfield - Mortgages - Evidence
http://livinglies.wordpress.com/


SURVIVAL/PREPAREDNESS:





Friday, July 9, 2010

PUBLIC OFFICERS, You Must Uphold The Constitution

PUBLIC OFFICERS:


Every Public Officer in Graham County, has sworn to uphold the law, by adhearing to the United States Constitution of America, and The Constitution of Arizona. Each Public Officer, Judge, County Attorney, Board of Supervisors, ect. all take a Loyalty Oath, "Oath of Office" and a "Official Bond as required by A.R.S. and Source: Arizona Session Laws.

When you take the Office, and take the money, but fail to qualify for the Office, Each Officer becomes vaccant in that Office.  
 

Monday, July 5, 2010

DEBT FREE

Become Debt Free

Dave Ramsey – DEBT FREE SOLUTION
www.daveramsey.com

1. Unite with your Family.

2. Buy property with family,

3. Pay off loans, or house mortgages as couples.

4. Buy Food Storage, and Water.

FREEDOM WATCH - HOSTED BY Judge Andrew Napolitano

Judge Napolitano

Has a New Show Called "FREEDOM WATCH" Monday July 5, 2010.

Guest: Glen Beck

He discusses the Oil Spill with Glenn Beck

Obama's Solution with the Oil Spill.
- Geen Agenda
- More New Tax

He also discussed the new U.S. Sumpreme Court Ruling "McDonald v. City of Cicago"
Otis Mcdonald and Lawyer Alan Gura take on 2nd Amendment rights against the City of Chicago.

Friday, July 2, 2010

NATIONWIDE LANDMARK DECISION - McDonald v. City of Chicago, No. 08-1521

ON JUNE 31, 2010
McDonald v. City of Chicago, Case No. (08-1521)
Otis McDonad has been robbed 3 times, and feels that he should have the right to protect himself, but the laws prohibiting guns keeps him from carrying a concealed weapon. It is however a US Constitutional Right, 2nd Amendement Right. His Lawyer, Alan Gura.
There are 9 U.S. Supreme Court Justices and 5 ruled in favor and 4 ruled against gun rights.
http://www.chicagoguncase.com/

CHIGACO, IL "US SUPREME COURT RULING"
ANY CITIZEN IN AMERICA IS ALLOWED TO CARRY A GUN.


Other LANDMARK DECISION Cases:
Rancher - Property Rights
Wayne Hage v. US
Case No. 91-1470L
Filed: August 2, 2010
Hage v. United States


.Sub-categories :

•Articles •Briefs and Opinions •Other Documents •Legal Counsel Overview:


Few epic battles for property rights have been waged and won by landowners, but Hage v. United States is one of the greatest stories of all time. After spending 13 years fighting the U.S. Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management for the right to use their land and water, Nevada ranchers, Wayne and Jean Hage, filed the most important federal lands takings case in American history. The members of Stewards of the Range supported their every step through the courts, which began in 1991.



The Hages owned the targeted property, Pine Creek Ranch, which was a combination of private land and federal grazing allotments that together controlled 1,100 square miles of Nevada’s High Desert. While the cow-calf operation is a normal sized ranch for the Nevada landscape (on average it takes 50 acres to feed one cow), the Hages controlled all the water on this vast landscape. The water is gravity flow to Las Vegas and gravity flow to Los Angeles.



The Hages found themselves in the crosshairs of those seeking to destroy private ownership of America’s resources through environmental regulations. In July of 1991, after the U.S. Forest Service confiscated their last remaining cattle and believed they had finally acquired this beautiful ranch property without paying a dime in compensation, Wayne and Jean did something never done before – they filed a claim for the taking of the rights they owned on the federal lands and their private property in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims.



June 6, 2008, the Court handed the Hages a dramatic victory. The court refused the government’s argument that the Hages were merely leaseholders who had no property rights in the federal lands. Instead, the Court awarded the Hages compensation for their range improvements, the water rights which flowed from the federal lands to their private lands, and the ditch right-of-ways which included the forage on 50 feet of each side of the ditches. They also awarded attorney’s fees, which is a critical deterrent to future frivolous lawsuits.



This was a landmark victory for Western ranchers and Americans nationwide. Although neither Wayne nor Jean was alive to celebrate the victory, they most certainly left a remarkable legacy for private property rights protection in America.



The government has filed an appeal in the U.S. Court of Appeals D.C. Circuit. It will be many years yet before final compensation and attorney’s fees will be awarded, however, the precedent stands and is used by landowners and attorneys across the nation today.

 
E. WAYNE HAGE and JEAN N. HAGE, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, CLAYTON YEUTTER, in his capacity as Secretary of Agriculture, F. DALE ROBERTSO...


http://americanstewards.us/about-us/historical-victories/hage-v-united-states/briefs-and-opinions










Monday, June 28, 2010

FBI INVESTIGATIONS

The FBI Investigated Corruption of These two Superior Court Judges
1. Dudley S. Welker
Dudley Welker honored

2. Rustin Lines

Now The People of Graham County want a FBI Investigation of all public records, which is long overdue, dealing with the following:
1. R. Douglas Holt, Presiding Superior Court Judge
2. Kenneth A. Angle, County Attorney
3. Terry Cooper, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors

We believe there is a conspiracy to commit fruad and racketeering between R. Douglas Holt, Kenneth A. Angle, and Terry Cooper, and possibly Preston J. Allred, that need to be resolved.